How to Buy Hang Seng Index ETFs in Singapore (2026)
The Hang Seng Index (HSI) has re-entered focus for global investors. After a prolonged downturn between 2021 and 2023, the index rebounded sharply with a +28% return in 2025 which is also its strongest performance in over a decade; driven by a recovery in Chinese technology giants and renewed policy support. It has continued to hold near multi-year highs into early 2026.
As one of Asia’s most important benchmarks, the Hang Seng Index tracks the largest companies listed in Hong Kong, spanning financials, property developers, and China’s leading internet platforms. For Singapore investors, it offers direct exposure to a market that is structurally different from both the STI and US indices.
But while the opportunity is clear, access is not.
There is no direct Hang Seng Index ETF listed on the Singapore Exchange (SGX). The only locally listed option tracks a technology sub-index, not the broader market. To invest in the full Hang Seng Index, Singapore investors must either use Hong Kong-listed ETFs, accept a tech-heavy proxy on SGX, or turn to US-listed alternatives.
This guide breaks down exactly how to buy Hang Seng Index ETFs from Singapore including the available ETFs, which platforms to use, what it costs, and how to place your first trade.
What is the Hang Seng Index?
The Hang Seng Index (HSI) is Hong Kong's flagship equity benchmark, first published on 24 November 1969 and backdated to 31 July 1964. Today it is compiled and maintained by Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Hang Seng Bank.
The index tracks the 88 largest and most liquid companies listed on the Main Board of the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX), covering more than 63.39% of total HKEX market value, making it the single most representative measure of the Hong Kong equity market.
Stocks are freefloat-adjusted for investability representation and an 8% individual stock cap is applied to prevent single-stock domination of the index.
The index is reviewed and rebalanced quarterly, with prices disseminated every two seconds during trading hours.
HSI compositions
The table below shows the top 10 HSI constituents by weighting with HSBC Holdings leads at 10.47%, followed by Alibaba and Tencent. Notably, financials dominate the top of the index, accounting for 6 of the top 10 slots.
| Rank | Stock Code | Company | Sector | Share Type | Weighting (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0005 | HSBC Holdings | Financials | HK Ordinary | 10.47 |
| 2 | 9988 | Alibaba (BABA-W) | Consumer Discretionary | Other HK-listed Mainland Co. | 7.18 |
| 3 | 0700 | Tencent | Information Technology | Other HK-listed Mainland Co. | 6.63 |
| 4 | 1299 | AIA Group | Financials | HK Ordinary | 5.52 |
| 5 | 0939 | CCB | Financials | H Share | 4.65 |
| 6 | 1810 | Xiaomi (XIAOMI-W) | Information Technology | Other HK-listed Mainland Co. | 3.85 |
| 7 | 1398 | ICBC | Financials | H Share | 3.22 |
| 8 | 0388 | HKEX | Financials | HK Ordinary | 3.05 |
| 9 | 0941 | China Mobile | Telecommunications | Red Chip | 2.98 |
| 10 | 2318 | Ping An Insurance | Financials | H Share | 2.76 |
*Source: Hang Seng Indexes Company Limited, February 2026 Factsheet. The top 10 holdings represent a combined weighting of 52.31% of the index.
Index composition: share types

The largest segment is HK-listed Mainland Companies (38.05%), including Tencent, Alibaba, and Xiaomi which are offshore-incorporated Chinese firms that are more market-driven and globally exposed.
HK Ordinary shares (30.40%) such as HSBC and AIA reflect Hong Kong’s role as a financial hub and are more sensitive to global interest rates and capital flows.
H Shares (24.00%) are mainland-incorporated companies listed in Hong Kong, typically banks and state-linked firms, making them more tied to China’s domestic economy and policy.
Red Chips (7.55%) are smaller in weight but still represent state-backed sectors like infrastructure and energy.
Overall, more than 60% of the index is linked to mainland China, but through different structures, which is why performance is not driven by a single “China trade”.
Index composition: industry weightings

The defining feature of the HSI is its heavy financial exposure (35.24%), making it highly sensitive to interest rates, credit cycles, and China’s property market.
Consumer Discretionary (22.99%) and Technology (14.46%) provide growth exposure, driven by platform companies like Alibaba and Tencent.
The rest of the index spans energy, property, healthcare, and defensive sectors, reinforcing that the HSI is a broad, cyclical index, not a pure growth benchmark.
What is a Hang Seng Index ETF?
A Hang Seng Index ETF is an exchange-traded fund that aims to replicate the performance of the Hang Seng Index (HSI) by holding the underlying stocks directly (full or sampled physical replication), or one of its related sub-indices
Like all ETFs, it trades on an exchange throughout market hours at real-time prices. Investors pay an annual expense ratio (TER), which is automatically reflected in the fund’s net asset value rather than charged separately.
The primary advantage is instant diversification. Instead of selecting individual Hong Kong stocks, investors gain exposure to around 80+ of the largest companies that include financials, property developers, and Chinese technology firms in a single trade. Compared to actively managed China or Hong Kong funds, HSI ETFs are also significantly cheaper, with leading funds charging ~0.09% annually, versus 1–2% for active strategies.
Important: not all “Hang Seng” ETFs track the same index
Not every ETF with “Hang Seng” in its name provides the same exposure.
- Hang Seng Index (HSI): Broad market benchmark (~80+ constituents across sectors)
- Hang Seng TECH Index: ~30 technology-focused companies (e.g. Tencent, Alibaba, Meituan)
- MSCI China / MSCI Hong Kong indices: Different methodologies, sector weights, and stock universes (commonly used by US-listed ETFs)
Always verify the underlying index before investing as it determines your sector exposure, risk profile, and long-term return characteristics.
How Singapore investors can access the Hang Seng Index
Singapore investors have three distinct routes to Hang Seng exposure. Each sits at a different point on the trade-off between convenience, tracking accuracy, and ongoing cost:
- SGX-listed
- HKEX-listed
- US-listed
Route 1: SGX-listed ETFs
For investors who want to stay on SGX, the universe is still fairly limited. The two names that matter most in this discussion are the Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng TECH ETF and the Lion-OCBC Securities China Leaders ETF.
The first gives you a direct play on Hong Kong-listed technology names. The second gives you broader China large-cap exposure through the Hang Seng Stock Connect China 80 Index, which is closer to a mainland-plus-Hong-Kong China allocation than a pure Hang Seng Index allocation.
| ETF name | SGX code(s) | Currency counter(s) | Index tracked | Expense ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng TECH ETF | HST / HSS | SGD / USD | Hang Seng TECH Index | 0.58% |
| Lion-OCBC Securities China Leaders ETF | YYY / YYR | SGD / RMB | Hang Seng Stock Connect China 80 Index | 0.62% |
The difference matters. Hang Seng TECH is a narrow, sector-heavy index dominated by internet, e-commerce, platform, and technology-related names.
China Leaders, by contrast, is broader and more diversified across major China sectors, but it still does not replicate the Hang Seng Index itself. In other words, SGX gives you workable listed shortcuts into the Hong Kong-China equity theme, but not a direct broad-market HSI tracker.
What the SGX route does well
| Strength | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Local market access | You can buy through a standard Singapore brokerage without needing a Hong Kong trading setup |
| Currency convenience | You can choose SGD, USD, or RMB counters depending on the ETF |
| SRS relevance | SGX-listed ETFs are often easier to integrate into local investing workflows |
| Familiar trading environment | Settlement, custody, and platform navigation are simpler for investors already used to SGX |
What the SGX route does not do well
| Limitation | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| No direct HSI ETF | You are not buying the broad Hang Seng Index |
| Higher concentration risk | HST is heavily tilted toward China tech |
| More interpretation required | Investors may think “Hang Seng” branding means broad HSI exposure when it does not |
| Potentially higher fees than HKEX benchmark options | The pure HSI ETFs in Hong Kong are generally cheaper |
When SGX-listed ETFs make sense
The SGX route works best for investors who want ease of execution first. If your goal is to add a Hong Kong or China growth sleeve to a Singapore-based portfolio without opening another market, these funds are practical.
Route 2: HKEX-listed HSI ETFs
If you want the closest, cleanest, and usually cheapest way to invest in the Hang Seng Index, the Hong Kong Stock Exchange is where you should look.
This is where the main HSI ETFs are listed, and where investors can buy funds that are explicitly built to track the full benchmark rather than a sectoral or China-related variation.
Core HSI ETFs (physical replication)
These ETFs form the core benchmark exposure and are what most long-term investors should focus on.
| ETF name | HKD ticker | USD ticker | Manager | Expense ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (TraHK) | 2800 | – | Hang Seng Investment | 0.015% - 0.045% |
| iShares Core Hang Seng Index ETF | 3115 | 9115 | BlackRock | 0.09% |
| Hang Seng Index ETF | 2833 | – | Hang Seng Investment | 0.12% |
| CSOP Hang Seng Index ETF | 3037 | – | CSOP | 0.10% |
| iShares Hang Seng TECH ETF | 3067 | 9067 | BlackRock | 0.25% |
| Hang Seng TECH Index ETF | 3032 | - | Hang Seng Investment | 0.67% |
| ChinaAMC Hang Seng TECH ETF | 3088 | 9088 | China Asset Management | 0.4% |
*Sliding fee structure depending on fund size.
These are true index trackers that are best for long-term allocation and lowest tracking deviation.
ESG and strategy-enhanced HSI ETFs
These ETFs modify the index with filters or income strategies, so they are not pure HSI exposure.
| ETF name | Ticker | Manager | Strategy | Expense ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Global X Hang Seng ESG ETF | 3029 | Mirae Asset / Global X | ESG-screened HSI | 0.29% |
| ChinaAMC HSI ESG ETF | 3403 | ChinaAMC | ESG-enhanced HSI | 0.15% |
| HSTECH ESG ETF | 3136 | Hang Seng Investment | ESG tech-focused | 0.29% |
| Global X HSI Covered Call Active ETF | 3419 | Global X | Covered call strategy | 0.75% |
These are objective-driven ETFs (ESG or income), not benchmark trackers. Use them only if you intentionally want those tilts.
Leveraged and inverse HSI ETFs (trading instruments)
These ETFs are designed for short-term tactical positioning, not investing.
| ETF name | Ticker | Exposure | Provider | Expense ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CSOP Hang Seng Index Daily (2x) Leveraged | 7200 | +2x daily | CSOP | 1.28% |
| CSOP Hang Seng Index Daily (-1x) Inverse | 7300 | -1x daily | CSOP | 1.27% |
| CSOP Hang Seng Index Daily (-2x) Inverse | 7500 | -2x daily | CSOP | 1.56% |
Route 3: US-listed alternatives
If you invest through US markets, there’s one important limitation: there is no US-listed ETF that directly tracks the Hang Seng Index (HSI).
Instead, you are using proxy ETFs that track Hong Kong or China indices that move similarly to the HSI, but are structurally different. This means your exposure will always be approximate, not exact.
Broad Hong Kong exposure (closest to HSI structure)
The closest substitutes are ETFs tracking Hong Kong indices. These give exposure to large HK-listed companies, but tend to underweight mainland Chinese tech, which is a meaningful part of the HSI.
| ETF name | Ticker | Index tracked | Expense ratio | What’s missing vs HSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| iShares MSCI Hong Kong ETF | EWH | MSCI Hong Kong | 0.50% | Limited China tech exposure |
| Franklin FTSE Hong Kong ETF | FLHK | FTSE Hong Kong | 0.09% | Similar structure, lower cost |
| iShares China Large-Cap ETF | FXI | FTSE China 50 | 0.74% | Skews heavily to SOEs and banks |
In simple terms, these ETFs either lean too heavily on Hong Kong financials (EWH, FLHK) or mainland state-owned companies (FXI). None capture the full balance of sectors seen in the Hang Seng Index.
China tech exposure (growth component of HSI)
If your focus is on the growth segment of the Hang Seng, US-listed tech ETFs offer closer alignment but only to that portion of the index.
| ETF name | Ticker | Focus | Expense ratio | Role vs HSI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| KraneShares Hang Seng TECH ETF | KTEC | HK-listed tech | 0.69% | Direct HSTECH exposure |
| KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | KWEB | China internet | 0.70% | High overlap (~60–70%) |
| Invesco China Technology ETF | CQQQ | Broad China tech | 0.65% | Includes A-shares |
These ETFs are more volatile and concentrated, and behave very differently from the full HSI, which is still heavily driven by financials and income-generating sectors.
The key drawback most investors miss
However, this route comes with a critical cost most investors underestimate: a 30% US withholding tax on dividends.
Because these ETFs are US-domiciled, Singapore investors do not benefit from any tax treaty reduction. This means dividends are taxed at source and cannot be recovered.
| Dividend yield | After 30% withholding tax |
|---|---|
| 4.0% | 2.8% |
| 3.0% | 2.1% |
This is not a small detail. The Hang Seng Index typically delivers 3–5% dividend yields, driven by banks, insurers, and state-linked companies. Losing 30% of that income can significantly reduce long-term returns.
How to buy Hang Seng Index ETFs in Singapore: step-by-step
Once you’ve decided how you want exposure whether through SGX-listed tech ETFs, HKEX-listed HSI ETFs, or US-listed proxies, the next step is choosing where to buy them.
The platform you use affects:
- Which markets you can access (SGX vs HKEX vs US)
- Your FX costs (SGD → HKD / USD)
- Your overall trading fees
In Singapore, investors typically use three routes: local bank brokerages, global/fintech brokers, and robo-advisors.
Local bank brokerages
Platforms like DBS Vickers, OCBC Securities, and UOB Kay Hian provide access to SGX, HKEX, and US markets.
They are reliable and easy to use, especially if you want to manage everything within your bank. However, they tend to be more expensive, with higher commissions and wider FX spreads.
They are typically used by investors who prioritise convenience and integration, rather than minimising cost.
Global and fintech brokers
Platforms like Interactive Brokers, Saxo, Tiger Brokers, Moomoo, and FSMOne are the most practical option for buying Hang Seng ETFs especially if you want direct HSI exposure via HKEX (e.g. 2800, 3115).
They offer:
- Direct access to HKEX
- Lower commissions and tighter FX spreads
- Better execution for international markets
For most investors, this is the default route if you are serious about tracking the Hang Seng Index properly.
Robo-advisors
Robo-advisors like StashAway offer a simplified way to invest in ETFs, sometimes including Hong Kong or China exposure.
However:
- They typically do not offer direct access to HKEX-listed HSI ETFs
- The ETF selection is limited and curated
They are better suited for beginners who prioritise ease of use over control and precision.
Platform comparison
| Platform type | Market access | Best for | Key limitation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local bank brokerage | SGX, HKEX, US | Convenience, integration | Higher fees |
| Global / fintech broker | SGX, HKEX, US | Lowest cost, full access | Requires thorough research |
| Robo-advisor | Limited (curated ETFs) | Ease of use, low cost | Limited ETF selection |
Investing in Hong Kong equities through StashAway
StashAway's ETF Explorer gives you direct access to 80+ ETF asset classes for a flat US$1 per transaction, with full SRS eligibility.
This includes US-listed China and Hong Kong-focused ETFs. It is purpose-built for investors who want to handpick specific ETFs without advisory fees.
Tax implications for Singapore investors
For Singapore investors, tax treatment is generally favourable but it still depends on where the ETF is domiciled. This is one of the most important differences between SGX, HKEX, and US-listed routes.
Capital gains tax
Singapore does not impose capital gains tax for most retail investors.
This means that any gains from selling ETFs whether listed on SGX, HKEX, or US exchanges are typically not taxed.
Investors who trade very frequently or derive their primary income from trading may be assessed differently, but this does not apply to most long-term investors.
Dividend withholding tax
Dividend taxation varies depending on where the ETF is listed.
| Route | Withholding tax | What you receive |
|---|---|---|
| SGX-listed ETFs | 0% | Full dividend |
| HKEX-listed ETFs | 0% | Full dividend |
| US-listed ETFs | 30% | Dividend reduced at source |
Hong Kong does not impose withholding tax on dividends, and Singapore does not tax foreign-sourced dividends received by individuals. As a result, SGX-listed and HKEX-listed ETFs are not subject to dividend tax at either level.
US-listed ETFs are different. Because they are domiciled in the United States, a 30% withholding tax applies to dividends paid to non-US investors. This is deducted automatically before the dividend is paid out.
For example, if an ETF has a dividend yield of 2.5%, the effective yield after tax would be approximately 1.75%.
This difference is more meaningful for indices like the Hang Seng Index, where dividends contribute a significant portion of total return.
US estate tax risk
US-listed ETFs may also expose investors to US estate tax.
For non-US investors, US-domiciled assets above US$60,000 may be subject to estate tax of up to 40% on the amount above this threshold.
This applies to US-listed ETFs such as EWH and KWEB.
By comparison, ETFs listed on SGX and HKEX are not subject to US estate tax, as they are not US-domiciled assets.
CPF and SRS: what Singapore investors can do
Eligibility for CPF and SRS investments depends on the listing location of the ETF and the approved investment schemes.
SRS (Supplementary Retirement Scheme)
SRS funds can be used to invest in approved SGX-listed ETFs.
The Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng TECH ETF (HST/HSS) is listed on SGX and is SRS-eligible. Investors can purchase it using SRS funds through brokerages that support SRS trading, such as DBS, OCBC, and UOB.
HKEX-listed ETFs, including HSI trackers such as 2800 and 3115, are not SRS-eligible, as they are not listed on SGX.
Some platforms, such as StashAway ETF Explorer, also support SRS investments and provide access to US-listed ETFs. These allow investors to gain exposure to Hong Kong and China markets through global ETFs.
However, these ETFs remain US-domiciled, so 30% dividend withholding tax applies, and the exposure may differ from the Hang Seng Index.
CPF (Central Provident Fund)
CPF investments under the CPF Investment Scheme (CPFIS) are limited to a list of approved products.
As of 2026:
- The Lion-OCBC Securities Hang Seng TECH ETF (HST) is not part of the standard CPFIS-approved ETF list
- HKEX-listed ETFs are not eligible
- US-listed ETFs are not eligible
Investors should check the latest CPFIS eligibility list directly before making any investment decisions.
Overall, access to Hang Seng-related ETFs through CPF remains limited, and most investors use cash or SRS funds for this exposure.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a direct Hang Seng Index ETF on SGX?
No. There is currently no SGX-listed ETF that tracks the full Hang Seng Index.
The closest option is the Lion-OCBC Hang Seng TECH ETF (HST/HSS), but it tracks only the Hang Seng TECH Index, which consists of around 30 technology companies.
If your goal is broad Hang Seng exposure across financials, property, and telecom sectors, you will need to use HKEX-listed ETFs such as 2800.HK or 3115.HK.
What is the most accurate way to track the Hang Seng Index?
The most accurate exposure comes from HKEX-listed physical replication ETFs.
Funds like the Tracker Fund of Hong Kong (2800.HK) are designed specifically to track the Hang Seng Index and hold the underlying constituents directly. This results in lower tracking deviation, full sector representation, and lower long-term costs.
SGX-listed and US-listed options are proxies, not exact trackers.
Why are HKEX-listed ETFs usually cheaper than SGX-listed options?
The difference comes down to scale and product design.
HKEX-listed HSI ETFs are the primary listing venue for Hang Seng products, with significantly larger assets under management and direct competition among similar funds. This allows expense ratios as low as ~0.05%, compared to ~0.45–0.60% for SGX-listed alternatives.
The trade-off is higher one-time access costs, including FX conversion and stamp duty.
Are US-listed ETFs a good substitute for the Hang Seng Index?
They can provide partial exposure, but they are not equivalent.
US-listed ETFs such as EWH or KWEB track different indices, have different sector weightings, and may not reflect the full composition of the Hang Seng Index.
More importantly, they introduce a structural cost: 30% US withholding tax on dividends, which directly reduces income returns.
Do I need a lot of capital to start investing in Hang Seng ETFs?
It depends on the route.
SGX-listed ETFs like HST typically require a few hundred Singapore dollars due to board lot sizes.
HKEX-listed ETFs such as 2800.HK generally require a higher initial investment, often around S$2,000 or more, due to larger lot sizes.
US-listed ETFs may allow smaller starting amounts, depending on whether your platform supports fractional shares.
Should I choose SGX, HKEX, or US-listed ETFs?
Each route serves a different purpose.
SGX-listed ETFs are simpler and SRS-compatible, but limited and relatively higher cost. HKEX-listed ETFs offer the most accurate and cost-efficient exposure to the Hang Seng Index. US-listed ETFs provide easy global access, but come with tax inefficiency and imperfect tracking.
The choice depends on whether you prioritise convenience, cost, or tracking accuracy.
Is the Hang Seng Index still relevant for long-term investors?
The Hang Seng Index remains a key Asian benchmark, but behaves differently from US indices.
It is more cyclical, more income-driven, and more exposed to financials and China-linked sectors. Returns can be uneven, including periods of extended drawdowns, but it continues to serve as a regional diversification allocation within a broader portfolio.


